SUPREME COURT & COURT OF APPEAL DECISIONS (13665)
Children categories
HELD:
"The law is settled that a Court of first instance or an intermediate Court has a duty to consider and make a pronouncement on all issues properly raised before it by the parties.
HELD:
"In the case of YAHAYA Vs. THE STATE (2002) 3 NWLR (Pt. 751) 289, this Court aptly pointed out the pertinent distinction between two dissimilar terminologies "re-trial" and "fresh trial", inter alia:
HELD:
"The law is settled that where a claimant has no locus standi, his action will be incompetent and the Court will have no jurisdiction to hear and adjudicate on the action.
HELD:
"The law is settled that what is expressly admitted need no further proof.
HELD:
"Just like cause of action, locus standi is determined from the statement of claim.
HELD:
"The term locus standi has been described as the legal capacity to institute legal proceedings before a Court.
HELD:
"It is the law that a grant of statutory right of occupancy extinguishes all other existing right to land.