Equitable Remedy (51)
HELD:
"It is very clear from the Record of Appeal that the trial Court failed to evaluate the issues and evidence before it to come to the conclusion of the grant of the application.
HELD:
"One of the considerations in deciding an application for an interlocutory injunction is balance of convenience.
HELD:
"The Apex Court has evolved principles that will guide the Courts in their decision on application for interlocutory injunction.
HELD:
"This appeal borders on the rule and/or principles governing/guiding the grant or refusal of an interlocutory injunction, whose purport is the preservation of the res in the litigation.
HELD:
"The Apex Court has evolved principles that will guide the Courts in their decision on application for interlocutory injunction.
HELD:
"This appeal borders on the rule and/or principles governing/guiding the grant or refusal of an interlocutory injunction, whose purport is the preservation of the res in the litigation.
HELD:
"It is well settled that an interlocutory injunction cannot be granted where there is nothing to restrain.
HELD:
"The law is firmly settled that the essence of granting an interlocutory injunction is to preserve the res from dissipation pending the resolution of the dispute presented before the Court.
HELD:
"...This Court will resist the invitation to make a determination, at the point of hearing an appeal against an interlocutory ruling, which will have the effect of pre-judging or pre-empting the issues for adjudication in the substantive suit before the lower Court.
HELD:
"This appeal borders on the rule governing the grant or refusal of an interlocutory injunction, whose purport is the preservation of the res in the litigation.