Instant SSL
Equity

Equity (20)

HELD:

"...The Appellant is a member of the 2nd Respondent and having been aware of the order for a re-run primary election, it was incumbent on him to keep his ear to the ground in respect of the anticipated re-run election.

HELD:

"The dispute between the appellant and the 1st respondent raises the equity of priority as well as the principle of nemo dat quod non habet.

HELD:

"It is trite that when the equities are equal, the first in time gets priority, it is ranked in order of creation, see AYANWALE V. ODUSAMI (2011) LPELR-8143(SC) which held as follows:

Go to top