"NEMO DAT QUOD NON HABET": what the maxim 'nemo dat quod non habet' entails and the effect thereof
HELD:
"Counsel to the appellant has contended that the Alade family having divested itself of their title to the appellant are incapable of validly conveying the same piece of land or any part thereof to the first respondent thereafter in 1972.
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.
Read 407 times
Published in: Legal Maxim
Latest from Okoye Chukwudi J
- NBA ABUJA YLF FORMER SOCIAL SECRETARY DEFENDS NBA FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF PORTABLE ZAZOO CRONY SAYS NBA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE.
- HON. JUSTICE CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE: HOW THE SOCIETY KILLS ITS BEST
- BURDEN OF PROOF/STANDARD OF PROOF - Burden and standard of proof required to prove an allegation of corrupt practices in an election
- INTERFERENCE WITH EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Duty of trial judge to evaluate evidence; instances where an appellate Court will not interfere
- EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Whether evaluation of evidence and ascription of probative value is a primary function of the trial Court; principles that guide the court in the evaluation of evidence
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.