INTERFERENCE WITH EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Duty of trial judge to evaluate evidence; instances where an appellate Court will not interfere
HELD:
"The Tribunal also considered the allegation on invalid votes which forms the complaint of the Appellant under issue 3 (three).
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.
Read 672 times
Published in: Appeals
Latest from Okoye Chukwudi J
- NBA ABUJA YLF FORMER SOCIAL SECRETARY DEFENDS NBA FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF PORTABLE ZAZOO CRONY SAYS NBA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE.
- HON. JUSTICE CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE: HOW THE SOCIETY KILLS ITS BEST
- BURDEN OF PROOF/STANDARD OF PROOF - Burden and standard of proof required to prove an allegation of corrupt practices in an election
- EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Whether evaluation of evidence and ascription of probative value is a primary function of the trial Court; principles that guide the court in the evaluation of evidence
- POWER OF COURT - Whether Courts have the power to adopt or re-formulate issues for determination
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.