FACTUAL DISTINCTIONS IN CASES - Duty of Court where the reliance on a precedent case is challenged in a proceeding on the basis that the facts are distinguishable from those of the present case
HELD:
"Where the reliance on a precedent case is challenged in a proceedings on the basis that the facts are distinguishable from those of the present case, the Court must determine if the facts of the two cases are the same or not.
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.
Read 279 times
Published in: Stare Decisis
Latest from Okoye Chukwudi J
- NBA ABUJA YLF FORMER SOCIAL SECRETARY DEFENDS NBA FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF PORTABLE ZAZOO CRONY SAYS NBA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE.
- HON. JUSTICE CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE: HOW THE SOCIETY KILLS ITS BEST
- BURDEN OF PROOF/STANDARD OF PROOF - Burden and standard of proof required to prove an allegation of corrupt practices in an election
- INTERFERENCE WITH EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Duty of trial judge to evaluate evidence; instances where an appellate Court will not interfere
- EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Whether evaluation of evidence and ascription of probative value is a primary function of the trial Court; principles that guide the court in the evaluation of evidence
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.