HELD:
HELD:
"The appellant was charged and prosecuted for the offence of culpable Homicide punishable with death under Section 221(b) of the Penal Code.
HELD:
"The respondent's case rested on circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is something from which facts in issue are/can be inferred.
HELD:
HELD:
"The provocation of the Appellant was as a result of all his gifts monetary to the deceased went out to her husband.
HELD:
"The record before this Court bears the fact that the appellant made a confessional statement before the police, and later retracted the said statement in Court.
HELD:
"The Appellant stood trial for culpable homicide punishable with death.
HELD:
HELD:
"The role of the Court is to apply the principles of substantial justice according to law.
HELD:
"This issue simply deals with the effect of the failure of an appellant in an appeal to file a reply brief in response to a preliminary objection raised by the respondent in the respondent's brief of argument.
