Instant SSL
Legislation

Legislation (66)

HELD:

"The Appellant raised non compliance with the ACJL 2011, Section 9(3) therein, the law had commenced operation then, the prosecution failed to show that it complied with this section in taking the statement, the onus is on the prosecution to prove voluntariness.

HELD:

"It is apposite to reiterate here that the substantive law applicable to a cause or matter is the law in existence at the time the cause of action arose.

HELD:

"Where a statute or rules of Court have provided for the method of doing a thing, it must be done in accordance with the express provisions of the statute or rules.

HELD:

"In yet another decided case that gives light in a situation such as in this appeal, this Court, in the case of NJC V. Senlong & Ors (2010) LPELR-4582 (CA) Pp. 51-52, paras E-B,

HELD:

"...Learned counsel for the appellant impugned the proceedings leading to the conviction of the appellant based on his interpretation of Sections 17 (2), 271 (3) and 356(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015.

HELD:

"...The provisions of Sections 25 - 35 of the Environmental Protection and Waste Management Agency Act, Cap. 47 Laws of Akwa Ibom State, 2000 contains myriads of Environmental standards while Schedule 11 thereof, listed the pollution Discharge fees.

Go to top