Documentary Evidence (136)
HELD:
"The learned appellant's counsel made copious reference to Sections 85, 86 (1), 88, 89 (1) (e) & (f), 90 (1) (c) and 102 (a) (iii) of the Evidence Act to submit that Exhibit B, a medical report made by the Pw.4, was inadmissible in its original form.
HELD:
"My Lords, in all honesty, I had always believed that, since this Court had interpreted the provisions apropos the certification of public documents in several decisions, all Courts should be, properly, guided on their import.
HELD:
"The drafts person of Section 104 of the Evidence Act, 2011, split its provisions into three subsections unlike the erstwhile Section 111 of the repealed Evidence Act which had just one long-winded provision.