CHIEFTAINCY DISPUTES: Effect of failure to comply with condition precedent in the determination of chieftaincy matters before resorting to the court
HELD:
"My lords, I think the only relevant issue in all the issues formulated by the parties, and upon which both parties are in tandem. is appellants issue No. 2 that is: "Whether the Court of Appeal is right in holding that the non-compliance with the provision of Section 20(1) and (2) by the respondent before coming to Court did not rob the Court of the jurisdiction to entertain the matter."
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.
Read 337 times
Published in: Chieftaincy Matters
Latest from Okoye Chukwudi J
- NBA ABUJA YLF FORMER SOCIAL SECRETARY DEFENDS NBA FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF PORTABLE ZAZOO CRONY SAYS NBA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE.
- HON. JUSTICE CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE: HOW THE SOCIETY KILLS ITS BEST
- BURDEN OF PROOF/STANDARD OF PROOF - Burden and standard of proof required to prove an allegation of corrupt practices in an election
- INTERFERENCE WITH EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Duty of trial judge to evaluate evidence; instances where an appellate Court will not interfere
- EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE - Whether evaluation of evidence and ascription of probative value is a primary function of the trial Court; principles that guide the court in the evaluation of evidence
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.