HELD:
"Ground 5, from whence the issue 4 was inter alia purportedly distilled, complained that the lower Court "erred in law in affirming the conviction of the Appellant on the ground that his counsel at the trial Court did not challenge or confront the prosecution with certain facts testified to at the trial".
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.